Oversold

AMZN

Valuation53/ 100
Cash flow & growth60/ 100
Upside potential46/ 100
Risk potential27/ 100

AMZN's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are somewhat mixed and weaker than expected earnings are holding it back.

Score change since last week

The score rose 12 points, mainly due to valuation and price changes. Price fell 3.0%, from $266.43 to $258.51. Reported EPS was unchanged, so the lower price improved valuation support.

Valuation and price changes added 11.9 points. The comparison uses the same available inputs on both dates. Displayed changes are rounded to whole points.

Valuation

Estimated operating-earnings valuation: current PE is 40.1x versus 45.8x in comparable estimated history. The model caps earnings at operating profit after interest, assuming proportional tax and per-share effects. This is an estimate, not a verified investment-gain adjustment.

Reported EPS and PE remain in the valuation table. The same estimate is applied to historical earnings and eligible price scenarios. Its contribution to the score is limited by the available evidence; it does not identify all non-recurring items. Comparable history: 28 weeks.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +15.8%, operating margin +0.7 percentage points. Free cash flow is -1.5% of revenue. The business score is 59.9/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Stronger earnings and valuation could support a higher share price.

Our favorable case uses $8.67 of EPS and a 41× PE, suggesting a share price of about $355.63. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The displayed favorable scenario is 38.5% upside, or about $355.64.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $5.66 of EPS and a 37.7× PE, suggesting a share price of about $213.23 — 27% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

AMZN vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE21x73x72% lower
PE percentile0.35099% lower
EPS$12.43$3.40266% higher
FCF-$11.6B$9.3B225% lower
Loading historical comparisons…

AMZN’s fundamentals are mixed relative to their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

AMZN Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly deteriorating
Forward earningsStrong decline
Forward revenueGrowth
Forward profitabilityStrongly contracting
Analyst coverageBroad
Estimate dispersionModerate

AMZN’s outlook is mixed, with weaker expected earnings weighing on the picture.

AMZN PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies AMZN's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

AMZN Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks AMZN's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

AMZN Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks AMZN's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

AMZN Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks AMZN's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

AMZN Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in AMZN's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

AMZN Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

AMZN PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares AMZN's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Consumer Cyclical sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

AMZN Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses AMZN's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

AMZN Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares AMZN's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

AMZN Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

FLUT

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth49/ 100
Upside potential39/ 100
Risk potential37/ 100

FLUT's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are somewhat mixed, while forward estimates point to improving growth and profitability, though analyst coverage is limited and estimates vary widely.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +15.2%, operating margin -7.4 percentage points. Free cash flow is 4.4% of revenue. The business score is 49/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Weaker business results limit upside support. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 23.8% upside, or about $124.49.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

The 37.1% downside is driven by operating stress: the model assumes earnings fall 23.8% and the PE falls 17.5%. That gives lower earnings at a lower valuation, or about the scenario price. Price swings alone suggest 33.9% downside.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

FLUT vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
EPS-$4.24-$2.11$2.13 lower
FCF$761.1M$729.8M4% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

FLUT’s fundamentals are mixed relative to their historical averages.

FLUT Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationImproving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueGrowth
Forward profitabilityStrongly expanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionWide

FLUT’s outlook is generally improving, though analyst coverage is limited.

FLUT PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies FLUT's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

FLUT Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks FLUT's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

FLUT Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks FLUT's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

FLUT Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks FLUT's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

FLUT Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in FLUT's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

FLUT Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

FLUT PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares FLUT's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Consumer Cyclical sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

FLUT Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses FLUT's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

FLUT Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares FLUT's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

FLUT Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.