Oversold

ASML

Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth71/ 100
Upside potential46/ 100
Risk potential32/ 100

ASML's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are above averages and forward estimates point to improving growth and profitability, though analyst coverage is limited.

Score change since last week

The score fell 7 points, mainly due to valuation and price changes. Price rose 1.1%, from $1696.16 to $1714.88. Reported EPS was unchanged, so the higher price reduced valuation support.

Valuation and price changes subtracted 6.6 points. The comparison uses the same available inputs on both dates. Displayed changes are rounded to whole points.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are strong. Over the past year: revenue +9.8%, earnings +14.9%, operating margin +0.6 percentage points. Free cash flow is 28.3% of revenue. The business score is 70.9/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 27.7% upside, or about $2168.73.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure; the separate operating stress is 19.7%. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 32% downside, or about $1154.84, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

ASML vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE53x42x27% higher
PE percentile915081% higher
EPS$32.14$18.2876% higher
FCF$11.7B$7.7B51% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

ASML’s earnings and cash flow are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is higher.

ASML Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly improving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueStrong growth
Forward profitabilityStrongly expanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionModerate

ASML’s outlook is generally improving, though analyst coverage is limited.

ASML PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies ASML's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

ASML Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks ASML's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

ASML Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks ASML's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

ASML Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks ASML's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

ASML Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in ASML's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

ASML Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

ASML PE vs Technology Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares ASML's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Technology sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

ASML Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses ASML's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

ASML Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares ASML's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

ASML Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

MSTR

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth42/ 100
Upside potential48/ 100
Risk potential56/ 100

MSTR's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are somewhat mixed and an expected return to profit offers recovery potential, though analyst coverage is limited and estimates vary widely.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +7.8%, operating margin -1356.6 percentage points. The business score is 41.5/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Weaker business results limit upside support. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 51.1% upside, or about $197.90.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure; the separate operating stress is 38.4%. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 56.4% downside, or about $57.10, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

MSTR vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE5.1x436x99% lower
PE percentile050100% lower
EPS-$96.83-$4.23$92.60 lower
FCF$11.3B-$1.6B+$13B
Loading historical comparisons…

MSTR’s earnings are below their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

MSTR Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuation--
Forward earningsTurning positive
Forward revenueStable
Forward profitability--
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionWide

MSTR’s available outlook is mixed, supported by an expected return to profitability.

MSTR PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies MSTR's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

MSTR Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks MSTR's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

MSTR Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks MSTR's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

MSTR Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks MSTR's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

MSTR Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in MSTR's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

MSTR Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

MSTR PE vs Technology Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares MSTR's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Technology sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

MSTR Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses MSTR's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

MSTR Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares MSTR's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

MSTR Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.