The score rose 3 points, mainly due to valuation and price changes. Price fell 1.3%, from $16.29 to $16.08. Reported EPS was unchanged, so the lower price improved valuation support.

Valuation and price changes added 2.8 points. The comparison uses the same available inputs on both dates. Displayed changes are rounded to whole points.

Historical cheapness: current PE is 7× versus the full-history median of 26.6× shown in the valuation table, producing 60.2/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 60/100. The model applies a -3.9% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 25.5× (18-month half-life). A reliable earnings-based price target is unavailable. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Business trends are strong. Over the past year: revenue +19.8%, earnings +447.2%, operating margin +28.4 percentage points. Free cash flow is 55.7% of revenue. The business score is 91.6/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 25.8% upside, or about $20.25.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure; the separate operating stress is 24%. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 34.3% downside, or about $10.58, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

The score rose 2 points, mainly due to valuation and price changes. Price rose 5.8%, from $30.47 to $32.25.

Valuation and price changes added 2.1 points. The comparison uses the same available inputs on both dates. Displayed changes are rounded to whole points.

Historical cheapness: current PE is 23.4× versus the full-history median of 93.9× shown in the valuation table, producing 57.2/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 57.2/100. The model applies a 14.3% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 77.6× (18-month half-life). A reliable earnings-based price target is unavailable. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Business trends are strong. Over the past year: revenue +42.8%, operating margin +5.3 percentage points. Free cash flow is 28.3% of revenue. The business score is 83.8/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 61.3% upside, or about $52.86.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure; the separate operating stress is 24.9%. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 53.2% downside, or about $15.34, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.