Oversold

BABA

Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth36/ 100
Upside potential42/ 100
Risk potential34/ 100

BABA's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are below averages, while forward estimates point to improving growth and profitability, though analyst coverage is limited and estimates vary widely.

Score change since last week

The score fell 11 points, mainly due to valuation and price changes. Price fell 4.8%, from $118.90 to $113.24.

Valuation and price changes subtracted 11.0 points. The comparison uses the same available inputs on both dates. Displayed changes are rounded to whole points.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are weak. Over the past year: revenue +4.3%, operating margin -9.8 percentage points. Free cash flow is -7.5% of revenue. The business score is 35.9/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Weaker business results limit upside support. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 24.8% upside, or about $136.41.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure; the separate operating stress is 32.1%. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 34% downside, or about $72.14, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

BABA vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE26x33x22% lower
PE percentile865072% higher
EPS$4.20$13.3469% lower
FCF-$11.2B$18.8B160% lower
Loading historical comparisons…

BABA’s earnings and cash flow are below their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

BABA Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly improving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueGrowth
Forward profitabilityExpanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionWide

BABA’s outlook is generally improving, though analyst coverage is limited.

BABA PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies BABA's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

BABA Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks BABA's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

BABA Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks BABA's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

BABA Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks BABA's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

BABA Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in BABA's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

BABA Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

BABA PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares BABA's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Consumer Cyclical sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

BABA Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses BABA's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

BABA Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares BABA's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

BABA Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

LIND

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth64/ 100
Upside potential46/ 100
Risk potential47/ 100

LIND's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are somewhat mixed, while forward estimates point to a return to profit and improving margins, though analyst coverage is limited and estimates vary widely.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +18.3%, operating margin +1.7 percentage points. The business score is 64.2/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 40.5% upside, or about $36.07.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure; the separate operating stress is 28%. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 47.1% downside, or about $13.58, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

LIND vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
EPS-$0.37-$1.44$1.06 higher
FCF$109M-$18.1M+$127.1M
Loading historical comparisons…

LIND’s earnings are above their historical averages.

LIND Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuation--
Forward earningsTurning positive
Forward revenueGrowth
Forward profitabilityExpanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionWide

LIND’s outlook is generally improving, supported by an expected return to profitability.

LIND PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies LIND's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

LIND Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks LIND's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

LIND Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks LIND's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

LIND Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks LIND's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

LIND Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in LIND's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

LIND Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

LIND PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares LIND's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Consumer Cyclical sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

LIND Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses LIND's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

LIND Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares LIND's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

LIND Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.