Oversold

BRSL

Same as last week
Valuation59/ 100
Cash flow & growth47/ 100
Upside potential39/ 100
Risk potential56/ 100

BRSL's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are below averages and weaker than expected earnings are holding it back, though analyst coverage is limited.

Valuation

Historical cheapness: current PE is 10.9× versus the full-history median of 19.7× shown in the valuation table, producing 63.1/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 58.6/100. The model applies a -15% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 21× (18-month half-life). A reliable earnings-based price target is unavailable. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +0.7%, earnings +4.2%, operating margin +3 percentage points. Free cash flow is -89.5% of revenue. The business score is 47.4/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 35.6% upside, or about $14.64.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

The 55.6% downside is driven by operating stress: the model assumes earnings fall 41.5% and the PE falls 24%. That gives $0.58 per share at a 8.3× PE, or about $4.80. Price swings alone suggest 48.9% downside. This includes further PE compression despite today’s low historical valuation.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

BRSL vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE11x20x46% lower
PE percentile051100% lower
EPS$0.99$1.001% lower
FCF-$2.2B$402M649% lower
Loading historical comparisons…

BRSL’s earnings and cash flow are below their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

BRSL Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly deteriorating
Forward earningsStrong decline
Forward revenueStable
Forward profitabilityStrongly contracting
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionModerate

BRSL’s outlook is weakening, with weaker expected earnings weighing on the picture.

BRSL PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies BRSL's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

BRSL Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks BRSL's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

BRSL Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks BRSL's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

BRSL Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks BRSL's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

BRSL Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in BRSL's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

BRSL Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

BRSL PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares BRSL's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Consumer Cyclical sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

BRSL Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses BRSL's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

BRSL Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares BRSL's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

BRSL Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

NIO

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth64/ 100
Upside potential49/ 100
Risk potential45/ 100

NIO's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are somewhat mixed, while forward estimates point to narrowing losses and improving margins, though analyst coverage is limited.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +63.7%, operating margin +29 percentage points. The business score is 63.5/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 43.2% upside, or about $5.28.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure; the separate operating stress is 27.7%. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 45.3% downside, or about $2.02, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

NIO vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
EPS-$0.28-$1.25$0.97 higher
Loading historical comparisons…

NIO’s earnings are above their historical averages.

NIO Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuation--
Forward earningsLoss narrowing
Forward revenueGrowth
Forward profitabilityExpanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionModerate

NIO’s outlook is generally improving, though analyst coverage is limited.

NIO PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies NIO's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

NIO Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks NIO's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

NIO Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks NIO's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

NIO Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks NIO's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

NIO Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in NIO's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

NIO Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

NIO PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares NIO's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Consumer Cyclical sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

NIO Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses NIO's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

NIO Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares NIO's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

NIO Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.