Oversold

FIGS

Valuation87/ 100
Cash flow & growth87/ 100
Upside potential79/ 100
Risk potential22/ 100

FIGS's valuation is historically cheap, fundamentals are above averages and forward estimates point to earnings and revenue growth, though analyst coverage is limited.

Score change since last week

The score rose 9 points, mainly due to valuation and price changes. Price fell 6.5%, from $15.42 to $14.42. Reported EPS was unchanged, so the lower price improved valuation support.

Valuation and price changes added 9.2 points. The comparison uses the same available inputs on both dates. Displayed changes are rounded to whole points.

Valuation

Historical cheapness: current PE is 40.4× versus the full-history median of 74.6× shown in the valuation table, producing 83.2/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 87.2/100. The model applies a 41% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 74.9× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 53.5× PE and $0.5 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are strong. Over the past year: revenue +24.7%, earnings +703.9%, operating margin +7.9 percentage points. Free cash flow is 13.7% of revenue. The business score is 87.2/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Stronger earnings and valuation could support a higher share price.

Our favorable case uses $0.50 of EPS and a 53.5× PE, suggesting a share price of about $27.02 — 102% above today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $0.29 of EPS and a 36.2× PE, suggesting a share price of about $10.37 — 22% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

FIGS vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE40x424x90% lower
PE percentile115078% lower
EPS$0.33$0.10230% higher
FCF$97.2M$36.9M163% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

FIGS’s earnings and cash flow are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

FIGS Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationImproving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueGrowth
Forward profitabilityStable
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionModerate

FIGS’s outlook is generally improving, though analyst coverage is limited.

FIGS PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies FIGS's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

FIGS Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks FIGS's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

FIGS Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks FIGS's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

FIGS Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks FIGS's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

FIGS Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in FIGS's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

FIGS Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

FIGS PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares FIGS's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Consumer Cyclical sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

FIGS Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses FIGS's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

FIGS Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares FIGS's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

FIGS Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

NIO

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth64/ 100
Upside potential49/ 100
Risk potential45/ 100

NIO's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are somewhat mixed, while forward estimates point to narrowing losses and improving margins, though analyst coverage is limited.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +63.7%, operating margin +29 percentage points. The business score is 63.5/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 43.2% upside, or about $5.28.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure; the separate operating stress is 27.7%. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 45.3% downside, or about $2.02, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

NIO vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
EPS-$0.28-$1.25$0.97 higher
Loading historical comparisons…

NIO’s earnings are above their historical averages.

NIO Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuation--
Forward earningsLoss narrowing
Forward revenueGrowth
Forward profitabilityExpanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionModerate

NIO’s outlook is generally improving, though analyst coverage is limited.

NIO PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies NIO's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

NIO Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks NIO's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

NIO Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks NIO's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

NIO Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks NIO's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

NIO Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in NIO's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

NIO Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

NIO PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares NIO's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Consumer Cyclical sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

NIO Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses NIO's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

NIO Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares NIO's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

NIO Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.