The score fell 1 point, mainly due to valuation and price changes. Price rose 12.3%, from $0.73 to $0.82. Reported EPS was unchanged, so the higher price reduced valuation support.

Valuation and price changes subtracted 1.2 points. The comparison uses the same available inputs on both dates. Displayed changes are rounded to whole points.

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: limited comparable growth data. The business score is 50/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 41.3% upside, or about $1.16.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 57.4% downside, or about $0.35, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.