Oversold

HSBC

Same as last week
Valuation16/ 100
Cash flow & growth65/ 100
Upside potential28/ 100
Risk potential26/ 100

HSBC's valuation is expensive while fundamentals provide solid support and forward estimates point to earnings growth and improving margins, though analyst coverage is limited.

Valuation

Historical cheapness: current PE is 15.2× versus the full-history median of 8.1× shown in the valuation table, producing 16.3/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 16.4/100. The model applies a 10.3% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 10.5× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 13.8× PE and $8.3 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue -3%, earnings +38.9%, operating margin +5.8 percentage points. The business score is 64.9/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

The earnings calculation and the displayed scenario are different.

The earnings case uses $8.28 of EPS and a 13.8× PE, suggesting about $114.04 before the minimum is applied. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The model applies a 15% minimum upside scenario, so the card shows +15%, or about $121.09. That adjusted price does not come from the EPS × PE calculation above.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $5.89 of EPS and a 13.2× PE, suggesting a share price of about $77.94 — 26% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

HSBC vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE15x9.9x53% higher
PE percentile855070% higher
EPS$6.95$4.1567% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

HSBC’s earnings are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is higher.

HSBC Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationImproving
Forward earningsGrowth
Forward revenueStrong decline
Forward profitabilityStrongly expanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionTight

HSBC’s outlook is generally improving, with declining sales expectations a concern.

HSBC PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies HSBC's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

HSBC Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks HSBC's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

HSBC Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks HSBC's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

HSBC Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks HSBC's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

HSBC Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in HSBC's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

HSBC Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

HSBC PE vs Financial Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares HSBC's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Financial Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

HSBC Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses HSBC's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

HSBC Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares HSBC's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

HSBC Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

IREN

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth50/ 100
Upside potential55/ 100
Risk potential65/ 100

IREN's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are somewhat mixed, while forward estimates point to narrowing losses and improving margins, though analyst coverage is limited and estimates vary widely.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +41.1%, operating margin -151.1 percentage points. The business score is 49.6/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Weaker business results limit upside support. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 78.6% upside, or about $78.28.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 64.8% downside, or about $15.43, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

IREN vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE886x416x113% higher
PE percentile715044% higher
EPS-$2.16-$2.18$0.02 higher
FCF-$2B-$465.3M-$1.5B
Loading historical comparisons…

IREN’s earnings are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is higher.

IREN Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuation--
Forward earningsLoss narrowing
Forward revenueStrong growth
Forward profitabilityStrongly expanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionWide

IREN’s outlook is generally improving, though analyst coverage is limited.

IREN PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies IREN's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

IREN Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks IREN's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

IREN Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks IREN's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

IREN Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks IREN's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

IREN Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in IREN's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

IREN Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

IREN PE vs Financial Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares IREN's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Financial Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

IREN Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses IREN's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

IREN Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares IREN's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

IREN Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.