Oversold

META

Valuation53/ 100
Cash flow & growth58/ 100
Upside potential46/ 100
Risk potential24/ 100

META's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are above averages, but weaker than expected earnings are holding it back.

Score change since last week

The score rose 1 point, mainly due to valuation and price changes. Price rose 6.7%, from $578.02 to $616.77.

Valuation and price changes added 0.8 points. The comparison uses the same available inputs on both dates. Displayed changes are rounded to whole points.

Valuation

Historical cheapness: current PE is 24.4× versus the full-history median of 26.7× shown in the valuation table, producing 56.1/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 52.8/100. The model applies a 4.8% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 26.3× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 26.1× PE and $29.8 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +27.7%, earnings -3.9%, operating margin -5.9 percentage points. Free cash flow is 18% of revenue. The business score is 57.9/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Stronger earnings and valuation could support a higher share price.

Our favorable case uses $29.84 of EPS and a 26.1× PE, suggesting a share price of about $778.17. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The displayed favorable scenario is 20.1% upside, or about $778.28.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $22.79 of EPS and a 21.8× PE, suggesting a share price of about $495.75 — 24% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

META vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE24x26x4% lower
PE percentile265047% lower
EPS$26.54$15.9566% higher
FCF$41B$38.5B7% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

META’s earnings and cash flow are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

META Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationDeteriorating
Forward earningsDecline
Forward revenueStrong growth
Forward profitabilityContracting
Analyst coverageBroad
Estimate dispersionModerate

META’s outlook is mixed, with weaker expected earnings weighing on the picture.

META PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies META's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

META Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks META's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

META Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks META's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

META Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks META's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

META Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in META's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

META Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

META PE vs Communication Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares META's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Communication Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

META Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses META's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

META Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares META's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

META Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

OUST

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth77/ 100
Upside potential58/ 100
Risk potential62/ 100

OUST's valuation appears fair while fundamentals provide solid support and forward estimates point to narrowing losses and improving margins, though analyst coverage is limited.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are strong. Over the past year: revenue +62.8%, operating margin +51.9 percentage points. The business score is 76.9/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 85.2% upside, or about $65.43.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure; the separate operating stress is 27.6%. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 62.1% downside, or about $13.39, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

OUST vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
EPS-$0.86-$13.54$12.68 higher
FCF-$82.5M-$80M-$2.5M
Loading historical comparisons…

OUST’s earnings are above their historical averages.

OUST Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuation--
Forward earningsLoss narrowing
Forward revenueStrong growth
Forward profitabilityStrongly expanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionTight

OUST’s outlook is generally improving, though analyst coverage is limited.

OUST PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies OUST's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

OUST Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks OUST's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

OUST Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks OUST's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

OUST Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks OUST's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

OUST Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in OUST's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

OUST Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

OUST PE vs Technology Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares OUST's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Technology sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

OUST Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses OUST's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

OUST Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares OUST's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

OUST Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.