Oversold

MU

Same as last week
Valuation63/ 100
Cash flow & growth94/ 100
Upside potential76/ 100
Risk potential30/ 100

MU's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are above averages and forward estimates point to improving growth and profitability, though estimates vary widely.

Valuation

Historical cheapness: current PE is 22.1× versus the full-history median of 21.8× shown in the valuation table, producing 49.2/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 62.6/100. The model applies a 44.2% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 24.5× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 29.3× PE and $68.7 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are strong. Over the past year: revenue +167%, earnings +696%, operating margin +43.1 percentage points. Free cash flow is 29% of revenue. The business score is 93.8/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Stronger earnings and valuation could support a higher share price.

Our favorable case uses $68.71 of EPS and a 29.3× PE, suggesting a share price of about $2013.06. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The displayed favorable scenario is 106.4% upside, or about $2012.94.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $38.88 of EPS and a 17.6× PE, suggesting a share price of about $684.31 — 30% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

MU vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE22x27x17% lower
PE percentile52503% higher
EPS$44.21$3.891,037% higher
FCF$26.2B$748.2M3,398% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

MU’s earnings and cash flow are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

MU Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly improving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueStrong growth
Forward profitabilityStrongly expanding
Analyst coverageBroad
Estimate dispersionWide

MU’s outlook is generally improving, though analysts differ widely on the estimates.

MU PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies MU's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

MU Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks MU's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

MU Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks MU's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

MU Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks MU's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

MU Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in MU's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

MU Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

MU PE vs Technology Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares MU's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Technology sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

MU Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses MU's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

MU Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares MU's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

MU Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

ZETA

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth71/ 100
Upside potential50/ 100
Risk potential53/ 100

ZETA's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are above averages and forward estimates point to improving growth and profitability, though analyst coverage is limited.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are strong. Over the past year: revenue +35.9%, operating margin +3.2 percentage points. The business score is 70.5/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 52.2% upside, or about $45.93.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure; the separate operating stress is 21.9%. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 53% downside, or about $14.18, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

ZETA vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
EPS-$0.01-$1.28$1.27 higher
FCF$224.4M$69.4M224% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

ZETA’s earnings and cash flow are above their historical averages.

ZETA Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly improving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueStrong growth
Forward profitabilityStrongly expanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionTight

ZETA’s outlook is generally improving, though analyst coverage is limited.

ZETA PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies ZETA's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

ZETA Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks ZETA's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

ZETA Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks ZETA's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

ZETA Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks ZETA's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

ZETA Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in ZETA's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

ZETA Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

ZETA PE vs Technology Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares ZETA's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Technology sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

ZETA Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses ZETA's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

ZETA Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares ZETA's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

ZETA Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.