Historical cheapness: current PE is 23.7× versus the full-history median of 6.6× shown in the valuation table, producing 6.7/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 6/100. The model applies a -7.4% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 7.6× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 21.5× PE and $0.2 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Business trends are weak. Over the past year: revenue -5%, earnings -80%, operating margin -24.7 percentage points. The business score is 26.5/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

The earnings calculation and the displayed scenario are different.

The earnings case uses $0.16 of EPS and a 21.5× PE, suggesting about $3.48 before the minimum is applied. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The model applies a 15% minimum upside scenario, so the card shows +15%, or about $4.30. That adjusted price does not come from the EPS × PE calculation above.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $0.11 of EPS and a 19.2× PE, suggesting a share price of about $2.20 — 41% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.