Oversold

RDDT

Valuation70/ 100
Cash flow & growth94/ 100
Upside potential80/ 100
Risk potential22/ 100

RDDT's valuation is historically cheap, fundamentals are above averages and forward estimates point to improving growth and profitability.

Score change since last week

The score rose 2 points, mainly due to valuation and price changes. Price rose 1.0%, from $153.00 to $154.46.

Valuation and price changes added 2.4 points. The comparison uses the same available inputs on both dates. Displayed changes are rounded to whole points.

Valuation

Historical cheapness: current PE is 36.7× versus the full-history median of 107.3× shown in the valuation table, producing 69.3/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 70/100. The model applies a 44.7% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 55.1× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 51.9× PE and $6.7 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are strong. Over the past year: revenue +66.6%, earnings +264.4%, operating margin +20.4 percentage points. Free cash flow is 36.7% of revenue. The business score is 94.4/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Stronger earnings and valuation could support a higher share price.

Our favorable case uses $6.69 of EPS and a 51.9× PE, suggesting a share price of about $347.32. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The displayed favorable scenario is 120.1% upside, or about $347.25.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $3.81 of EPS and a 32.1× PE, suggesting a share price of about $122.58 — 22% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

RDDT vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE37x113x68% lower
PE percentile5.65189% lower
EPS$4.30-$0.62$4.92 higher
FCF$1B$108.3M840% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

RDDT’s earnings and cash flow are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

RDDT Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly improving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueStrong growth
Forward profitabilityStrongly expanding
Analyst coverageModerate
Estimate dispersionModerate

RDDT’s outlook is generally improving, with growth expectations supporting the valuation case.

RDDT PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies RDDT's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

RDDT Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks RDDT's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

RDDT Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks RDDT's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

RDDT Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks RDDT's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

RDDT Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in RDDT's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

RDDT Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

RDDT PE vs Communication Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares RDDT's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Communication Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

RDDT Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses RDDT's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

RDDT Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares RDDT's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

RDDT Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

TU

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth61/ 100
Upside potential23/ 100
Risk potential36/ 100

TU's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are somewhat mixed and weaker than expected earnings are holding it back, though analyst coverage is limited and estimates vary widely.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue -1.1%, operating margin +2.7 percentage points. Free cash flow is 9.3% of revenue. The business score is 60.8/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 15% upside, or about $10.46. This uses the 15% minimum allowance.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

The 36.1% downside is driven by operating stress: the model assumes earnings fall 25.3% and the PE falls 14.5%. That gives $0.29 per share at a 20.1× PE, or about $5.81. Price swings alone suggest 18.5% downside.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

TU vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE23x24x1% lower
PE percentile575013% higher
EPS-$0.41$0.67161% lower
FCF$1.4B$756.3M80% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

TU’s fundamentals are mixed relative to their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

TU Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationDeteriorating
Forward earningsDecline
Forward revenueStable
Forward profitabilityContracting
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionWide

TU’s outlook is weakening, with weaker expected earnings weighing on the picture.

TU PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies TU's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

TU Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks TU's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

TU Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks TU's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

TU Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks TU's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

TU Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in TU's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

TU Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

TU PE vs Communication Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares TU's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Communication Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

TU Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses TU's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

TU Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares TU's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

TU Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.