Oversold

SNOW

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth76/ 100
Upside potential46/ 100
Risk potential41/ 100

SNOW's valuation appears fair while fundamentals provide solid support and forward estimates point to improving growth and profitability, though estimates vary widely.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are strong. Over the past year: revenue +32%, operating margin +14.7 percentage points. The business score is 75.9/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 34.8% upside, or about $443.48.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure; the separate operating stress is 20.4%. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 40.8% downside, or about $194.76, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

SNOW vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
EPS-$3.18-$2.81$0.37 lower
FCF$1.2B$513.6M133% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

SNOW’s fundamentals are mixed relative to their historical averages.

SNOW Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly improving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueStrong growth
Forward profitabilityStrongly expanding
Analyst coverageBroad
Estimate dispersionWide

SNOW’s outlook is generally improving, though analysts differ widely on the estimates.

SNOW PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies SNOW's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

SNOW Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks SNOW's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

SNOW Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks SNOW's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

SNOW Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks SNOW's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

SNOW Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in SNOW's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

SNOW Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

SNOW PE vs Technology Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares SNOW's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Technology sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

SNOW Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses SNOW's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

SNOW Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares SNOW's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

SNOW Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

TMUS

Same as last week
Valuation76/ 100
Cash flow & growth55/ 100
Upside potential72/ 100
Risk potential18/ 100

TMUS's valuation is historically cheap, fundamentals are above averages and forward estimates point to earnings growth and improving margins.

Valuation

Historical cheapness: current PE is 19.1× versus the full-history median of 26.2× shown in the valuation table, producing 70.3/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 76/100. The model applies a 27.4% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 22.7× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 21.4× PE and $13.1 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +9.7%, earnings -9.8%, operating margin -2.8 percentage points. Free cash flow is 16.6% of revenue. The business score is 54.8/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Stronger earnings and valuation could support a higher share price.

Our favorable case uses $13.08 of EPS and a 21.4× PE, suggesting a share price of about $279.80. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The displayed favorable scenario is 53.5% upside, or about $279.88.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $8.33 of EPS and a 18× PE, suggesting a share price of about $150.42 — 18% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

TMUS vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE19x38x50% lower
PE percentile45092% lower
EPS$9.55$5.5373% higher
FCF$15.3B$3.9B290% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

TMUS’s earnings and cash flow are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

TMUS Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly improving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueStable
Forward profitabilityExpanding
Analyst coverageModerate
Estimate dispersionTight

TMUS’s outlook is generally improving, with growth expectations supporting the valuation case.

TMUS PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies TMUS's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

TMUS Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks TMUS's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

TMUS Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks TMUS's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

TMUS Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks TMUS's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

TMUS Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in TMUS's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

TMUS Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

TMUS PE vs Communication Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares TMUS's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Communication Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

TMUS Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses TMUS's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

TMUS Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares TMUS's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

TMUS Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.