The score fell 10 points, mainly due to valuation and price changes. Price fell 0.4%, from $37.29 to $37.15.

Valuation and price changes subtracted 9.8 points. The comparison uses the same available inputs on both dates. Displayed changes are rounded to whole points.

Historical cheapness: current PE is 29× versus the full-history median of 16.9× shown in the valuation table, producing 19.4/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 25.6/100. The model applies a 35.2% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 21.2× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 28.1× PE and $1.8 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Business trends are strong. Over the past year: revenue +48.4%, earnings +60.8%, operating margin +26.7 percentage points. Free cash flow is 17.9% of revenue. The business score is 91.3/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Stronger earnings and valuation could support a higher share price.

Our favorable case uses $1.83 of EPS and a 28.1× PE, suggesting a share price of about $51.48. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The displayed favorable scenario is 42.1% upside, or about $51.50.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $1.07 of EPS and a 20× PE, suggesting a share price of about $21.42 — 41% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.