Oversold

TMUS

Same as last week
Valuation76/ 100
Cash flow & growth55/ 100
Upside potential72/ 100
Risk potential18/ 100

TMUS's valuation is historically cheap, fundamentals are above averages and forward estimates point to earnings growth and improving margins.

Valuation

Historical cheapness: current PE is 19.1× versus the full-history median of 26.2× shown in the valuation table, producing 70.3/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 76/100. The model applies a 27.4% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 22.7× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 21.4× PE and $13.1 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +9.7%, earnings -9.8%, operating margin -2.8 percentage points. Free cash flow is 16.6% of revenue. The business score is 54.8/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Stronger earnings and valuation could support a higher share price.

Our favorable case uses $13.08 of EPS and a 21.4× PE, suggesting a share price of about $279.80. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The displayed favorable scenario is 53.5% upside, or about $279.88.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $8.33 of EPS and a 18× PE, suggesting a share price of about $150.42 — 18% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

TMUS vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE19x38x50% lower
PE percentile45092% lower
EPS$9.55$5.5373% higher
FCF$15.3B$3.9B290% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

TMUS’s earnings and cash flow are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

TMUS Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly improving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueStable
Forward profitabilityExpanding
Analyst coverageModerate
Estimate dispersionTight

TMUS’s outlook is generally improving, with growth expectations supporting the valuation case.

TMUS PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies TMUS's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

TMUS Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks TMUS's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

TMUS Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks TMUS's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

TMUS Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks TMUS's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

TMUS Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in TMUS's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

TMUS Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

TMUS PE vs Communication Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares TMUS's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Communication Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

TMUS Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses TMUS's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

TMUS Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares TMUS's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

TMUS Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

VOD

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth50/ 100
Upside potential38/ 100
Risk potential23/ 100

VOD's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are somewhat mixed, while forward estimates point to earnings growth and improving margins, though analyst coverage is limited and estimates vary widely.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: limited comparable growth data. The business score is 50/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Business trends and outlook support upside. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 15% upside, or about $20.01. This uses the 15% minimum allowance.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 23.4% downside, or about $13.33, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

VOD vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE1.9x17x89% lower
PE percentile52503% higher
EPS$9.14$3.02203% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

VOD’s earnings are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

VOD Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly improving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueStrong decline
Forward profitabilityStrongly expanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionWide

VOD’s outlook is generally improving, with declining sales expectations a concern.

VOD PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies VOD's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

VOD Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks VOD's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

VOD Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks VOD's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

VOD Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks VOD's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

VOD Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in VOD's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

VOD Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

VOD PE vs Communication Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares VOD's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Communication Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

VOD Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses VOD's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

VOD Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares VOD's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

VOD Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.