Oversold

TMUS

Same as last week
Valuation76/ 100
Cash flow & growth55/ 100
Upside potential72/ 100
Risk potential18/ 100

TMUS's valuation is historically cheap, fundamentals are above averages and forward estimates point to earnings growth and improving margins.

Valuation

Historical cheapness: current PE is 19.1× versus the full-history median of 26.2× shown in the valuation table, producing 70.3/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 76/100. The model applies a 27.4% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 22.7× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 21.4× PE and $13.1 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +9.7%, earnings -9.8%, operating margin -2.8 percentage points. Free cash flow is 16.6% of revenue. The business score is 54.8/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Stronger earnings and valuation could support a higher share price.

Our favorable case uses $13.08 of EPS and a 21.4× PE, suggesting a share price of about $279.80. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The displayed favorable scenario is 53.5% upside, or about $279.88.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $8.33 of EPS and a 18× PE, suggesting a share price of about $150.42 — 18% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

TMUS vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE19x38x50% lower
PE percentile45092% lower
EPS$9.55$5.5373% higher
FCF$15.3B$3.9B290% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

TMUS’s earnings and cash flow are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

TMUS Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStrongly improving
Forward earningsStrong growth
Forward revenueStable
Forward profitabilityExpanding
Analyst coverageModerate
Estimate dispersionTight

TMUS’s outlook is generally improving, with growth expectations supporting the valuation case.

TMUS PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies TMUS's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

TMUS Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks TMUS's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

TMUS Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks TMUS's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

TMUS Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks TMUS's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

TMUS Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in TMUS's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

TMUS Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

TMUS PE vs Communication Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares TMUS's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Communication Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

TMUS Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses TMUS's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

TMUS Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares TMUS's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

TMUS Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

YELP

Valuation93/ 100
Cash flow & growth57/ 100
Upside potential65/ 100
Risk potential20/ 100

YELP's valuation is historically cheap, fundamentals are above averages, but expected margin pressure tempers an otherwise stable outlook, though analyst coverage is limited.

Score change since last week

The score rose 12 points, mainly due to valuation and price changes. Price fell 6.6%, from $23.18 to $21.66. Reported EPS was unchanged, so the lower price improved valuation support.

Valuation and price changes added 11.8 points. The comparison uses the same available inputs on both dates. Displayed changes are rounded to whole points.

Valuation

Historical cheapness: current PE is 10.2× versus the full-history median of 34.2× shown in the valuation table, producing 92.9/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 93.1/100. The model applies a 15.9% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 16.9× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 11.8× PE and $2.6 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +1.5%, earnings -5.9%, operating margin -0.5 percentage points. Free cash flow is 20.1% of revenue. The business score is 56.9/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Stronger earnings and valuation could support a higher share price.

Our favorable case uses $2.61 of EPS and a 11.8× PE, suggesting a share price of about $30.95. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The displayed favorable scenario is 45.4% upside, or about $30.94.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $1.76 of EPS and a 9.7× PE, suggesting a share price of about $17.07 — 20% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

YELP vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE10x43x76% lower
PE percentile25096% lower
EPS$2.08$1.0599% higher
FCF$296.8M$224.6M32% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

YELP’s earnings and cash flow are above their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is lower.

YELP Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStable
Forward earningsStable
Forward revenueStable
Forward profitabilityContracting
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionModerate

YELP’s outlook is generally stable, with narrowing profit margins the main concern.

YELP PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies YELP's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

YELP Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks YELP's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

YELP Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks YELP's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

YELP Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks YELP's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

YELP Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in YELP's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

YELP Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

YELP PE vs Communication Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares YELP's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Communication Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

YELP Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses YELP's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

YELP Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares YELP's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

YELP Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.