Oversold

VZ

Same as last week
Valuation24/ 100
Cash flow & growth50/ 100
Upside potential28/ 100
Risk potential26/ 100

VZ's valuation is expensive, fundamentals are somewhat mixed and the outlook is broadly stable.

Valuation

Historical cheapness: current PE is 13.2× versus the full-history median of 8.9× shown in the valuation table, producing 25.7/100. Positive weekly observations receive equal weight; lower past EPS alone does not disqualify them.

Outlook-adjusted valuation: 23.9/100. The model applies a 6% earnings-growth assumption and a 10% annual return hurdle, with positive credit limited by evidence coverage and confidence.

Forward price scenarios use recent PE history separately. Recent history has a separately weighted median of 9.8× (18-month half-life). The favorable scenario uses 11.9× PE and $4.4 projected EPS, informed by growth, margins and earnings-quality checks. This is a model scenario, not an analyst target. A return to the full-history median is not assumed.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +1.4%, earnings -10.5%, operating margin -2.4 percentage points. Free cash flow is 15.4% of revenue. The business score is 49.9/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

The earnings calculation and the displayed scenario are different.

The earnings case uses $4.37 of EPS and a 11.9× PE, suggesting about $51.87 before the minimum is applied. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

The model applies a 15% minimum upside scenario, so the card shows +15%, or about $58.20. That adjusted price does not come from the EPS × PE calculation above.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Weaker than expected earnings could put pressure on the share price.

Our downside case uses $3.29 of EPS and a 11.4× PE, suggesting a share price of about $37.59 — 26% below today’s price. Valuation history and outlook inform the PE.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

VZ vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
PE13x9.3x42% higher
PE percentile895077% higher
EPS$3.84$4.3512% lower
FCF$21.4B$9.1B135% higher
Loading historical comparisons…

VZ’s fundamentals are mixed relative to their historical averages, while its earnings multiple is higher.

VZ Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuationStable
Forward earningsStable
Forward revenueStable
Forward profitabilityExpanding
Analyst coverageModerate
Estimate dispersionTight

VZ’s outlook is generally stable.

VZ PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies VZ's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

VZ Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks VZ's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

VZ Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks VZ's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

VZ Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks VZ's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

VZ Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in VZ's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

VZ Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

VZ PE vs Communication Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares VZ's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Communication Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

VZ Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses VZ's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

VZ Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares VZ's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

VZ Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.

WULF

Same as last week
Valuation50/ 100
Cash flow & growth45/ 100
Upside potential52/ 100
Risk potential63/ 100

WULF's valuation appears fair, fundamentals are somewhat mixed, while forward estimates point to narrowing losses and improving margins, though analyst coverage is limited and estimates vary widely.

Valuation

Valuation stays neutral because earnings are difficult to compare across periods. Business trends, outlook and financial risk still contribute to the overall score.

Cash flow & growth

Business trends are mixed. Over the past year: revenue +14.6%, operating margin -133.4 percentage points. The business score is 44.9/100. Growth, margins and cash generation drive the score. Missing or older data receives less weight.

Favorable scenario

Weaker business results limit upside support. Price history provides the reference because earnings are difficult to compare.

The calculation starts with the stock’s typical weekly price movements, adjusted for business performance and outlook. Unusually large jumps have less influence. The result is 67.7% upside, or about $28.07.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

Downside scenario

Historical price swings are the main risk driver, even without a sharp profit decline.

The stock’s historical price swings drive this figure. Price history and operating stress provide the reference because comparable earnings do not support a future PE target. Operating stress reflects revenue, earnings, margins, outlook and relevant debt exposure. The larger stress gives 62.5% downside, or about $6.28, with a 15% minimum.

This is a scenario based on our model, not a forecast or probability.

WULF vs Historical averages

MetricCurrentAverageRelative
EPS-$4.40-$9,113.94$9,109.54 higher
FCF-$2.5B-$267.9M-$2.2B
Loading historical comparisons…

WULF’s earnings are above their historical averages.

WULF Forward outlook

MetricOutlook
Forward valuation--
Forward earningsLoss narrowing
Forward revenueStrong growth
Forward profitabilityStrongly expanding
Analyst coverageLimited
Estimate dispersionWide

WULF’s outlook is generally improving, though analyst coverage is limited.

WULF PE Valuation

Loading pe valuation table…

This table applies WULF's historical price-to-earnings (PE) landmarks to current earnings. The implied prices are valuation scenarios, not price forecasts or targets.

WULF Earnings Per Share

Loading earnings per share…

This chart tracks WULF's trailing twelve-month diluted earnings per share, calculated from four consecutive reported quarters to reduce seasonal noise.

WULF Quarterly Revenue

Loading quarterly revenue…

This chart tracks WULF's quarterly revenue over time and shows how sales are changing from year to year.

WULF Free Cash Flow

Loading free cash flow…

This chart tracks WULF's free cash flow over time, showing whether the business is consistently generating cash after operating costs and capital spending.

WULF Total Shares

Loading shares over time…

This chart tracks changes in WULF's diluted share count. A rising count can dilute existing owners, while a falling count often reflects share repurchases.

WULF Net Leverage

Loading net leverage…

Quarterly Net Leverage uses the last 12 months of EBITDA. A falling multiple generally indicates less debt relative to earnings capacity. Negative values mean net cash; missing data or nonpositive LTM EBITDA are N/A. The table shows each period’s Net Leverage and status.

WULF PE vs Financial Services Sector

Loading pe vs sector average…

This chart compares WULF's price-to-earnings (PE) ratio with the Financial Services sector average. A discount or premium can reflect differences in expected growth, profitability, or risk.

WULF Weekly Price

Loading weekly price…

This chart uses WULF's weekly closing prices to show the longer-term trend. The lower panes show weekly RSI and Stochastic momentum.

WULF Weekly Moving Averages

Loading weekly moving averages…

This chart compares WULF's 8, 20, 50, 100, and 200-week moving averages from 2020 onward. Shorter averages react faster to price changes, while longer averages show the broader trend.

WULF Yearly ROI

Loading yearly ROI…

Each line starts at 0% using the year’s first dependable weekly close and tracks the return through December, or through the latest available week for the current year.